When we compare Hofstader's phrases of humans with the ones with computers, we cant really tell the difference. But the phrases made by the humans have more meaning, while the ones of the computer are just words arranged together, and it doesn't mean that the computer knows what it is writing.
When we read we only see symbols, that we later translate from our eyes to our ears and later to our mind. (from one level to next, and the next).
Why should we think that Artificial Intelligence just wants to represent our intelligence, like a copy. When we should really look at AI as an improvement of our thought?
This way AI wouldn't just be a machine that helps us do things (like a calculator).
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario